FOR MEDICAL EXPERTS & ADVISORS

A calibrated read your testimony can stand on.

When you read a fetal heart rate record for a case, your interpretation gets challenged on cross-examination. Footmark AI gives you a reproducible, calibrated measurement layer beneath your opinion — every baseline, deceleration, and timing call traced to the evidence — so your judgment stands on a record that doesn't move.

Built for retained medical experts, expert-witness firms, and medical directors.

Case File

FHR-2024-08831

CATEGORY III
FHR (bpm)14:00 – 14:50
UC
TimeFeatureConf.
14:02Baseline 140 bpm0.98
14:18Minimal variability0.94
14:31Late deceleration0.97
14:44Recurrent late decels0.96

Plain-language analysis

Recurrent late decelerations beginning at 14:31 with minimal variability suggest evolving fetal acidemia. The pattern meets NICHD Category III criteria at 14:44 — a 27-minute window before delivery at 15:11.

Illustrative example. Not a real patient record.

Your opinion is only as defensible as the read it rests on.

Even among board-certified specialists, inter-observer agreement on the same fetal heart rate record has been reported below 40% in peer-reviewed studies1 — and opposing counsel knows it. Footmark AI gives you an objective measurement layer so your clinical judgment isn't the only thing on the stand. You bring the interpretation and the credibility; Footmark brings calibrated, reproducible measurements that hold their ground under questioning.

Defensibility for your testimony

The forensic layer's calibration and audit trail make your measurements reproducible. When opposing counsel asks how you know the deceleration began at 14:31, the answer is a documented, calibrated measurement — not "in my experience."

Difficult cross-examination questions get a documented, calibrated answer rather than a matter of recollection.

Speed without cutting corners

Get the structured read in minutes. Spend your time on the clinical judgment and the narrative, not on hand-measuring the strip.

Your time is the expensive part. Footmark handles the mechanical work so you don't.

You stay in the chair

Footmark measures while you interpret and testify: it's the instrument and you remain the expert, so nothing about it puts your role at risk.

Instruments don't replace experts. They make the experts who use them harder to challenge.

From record to a read you can build on, in three steps.

01

Upload the record

Submit the fetal heart rate record for the case — scanned paper, digital file, or PDF. We accept any format and any age of record.

02

Footmark AI reads it

The forensic layer extracts and calibrates baseline, variability, decelerations, and contractions, with confidence scoring and a documented audit trail.

03

Build your opinion on it

Use the calibrated findings as the measurement foundation beneath your interpretation — and as the record you point to when your read is questioned.

Footmark doesn't replace you. It backs you up.

The expert-witness system isn't the problem to be solved here — you are the credibility a courtroom needs. What it's missing is a calibrated, reproducible measurement layer beneath the opinion. Footmark provides exactly that: it standardizes the read across your cases, shortens the mechanical work, and gives your testimony a foundation that's far harder to impeach than unaided interpretation.

Built on validated methodology.

Footmark's methodology is validated against established intrapartum CTG databases and informed by peer-reviewed clinical literature and established interpretation standards (NICHD and FIGO). Every measurement is calibrated and documented, so the basis for each finding is transparent and reproducible.

Common questions.

What medical experts and advisors ask before their first analysis.

Request access.

Footmark AI is onboarding medical experts and advisors now. Request access and we will be in touch within one business day.

Only name, email, organization, and role are required. No spam. No sales calls unless you request one.

¹ Inter-observer agreement on fetal heart rate interpretation has been reported below 40% in peer-reviewed studies.